<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to Do about the Multiple Surgery Reduction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dermatologymedicalbilling.com/dermatology-coding-for-compliance/what-to-do-about-the-multiple-surgery-reduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dermatologymedicalbilling.com/dermatology-coding-for-compliance/what-to-do-about-the-multiple-surgery-reduction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:46:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Velazquez</title>
		<link>http://dermatologymedicalbilling.com/dermatology-coding-for-compliance/what-to-do-about-the-multiple-surgery-reduction/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Velazquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dermatologymedicalbilling.com/?p=12#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I am considering starting MOHS surgury in my practice but this multiple exeption rule reversal has me concern. The use of another physician at one&#039;s office or a physician extender that are in your practice that probably are being billed with the company&#039;s group practice # first and then one will use the providers# second; Can you get 100% reimbursement using the second person to do the closure? Or because it&#039;s the same group # then would it be denied? Can you please answer me back with my email. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am considering starting MOHS surgury in my practice but this multiple exeption rule reversal has me concern. The use of another physician at one&#8217;s office or a physician extender that are in your practice that probably are being billed with the company&#8217;s group practice # first and then one will use the providers# second; Can you get 100% reimbursement using the second person to do the closure? Or because it&#8217;s the same group # then would it be denied? Can you please answer me back with my email. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

